CCKM Reviews of Evidence
feature the best elements of traditional systematic review
methods such as those developed by the
Collaboration for biomedical
sciences and used by the
Collaboration. However, CCKM
tailors its methods to the characteristics,
realities, and applications of research in social
and behavioural sciences.
Students and staff use
CCKM Protocols such
as Question & Concept Maps,
Search Development Diaries,
Search Strategies & Database
Inclusion & Exclusion Criteria,
Extraction Coding Forms to maintain high quality
research review standards while
meeting the need-to-know time-demands of policy
analysts and practitioners.
CCKM Reviews of Evidence are
systematic, collaborative, transparent, and dispassionate.
applies advanced techniques from information science to retrieve
governmental, organizational, and media reports that identify how issues
are defined by decisions makers and the public.
recognizes that research
findings gain meaning when they framed in their social and
example of a Review of Evidence, read the Single Sex Schooling